Tyrant Pope Francis is Declared a Heretic

May the grace of God Our Lord Jesus Christ be with you!

Ladies and gentlemen, brothers and sisters in Christ

The Grand Inquisitor—Inquisition, starts the series of heresy declarations, with the most famous heretic of today, Pope Francis, a man whose name is known by many, but few really know what he is made of.

Pope Francis’ Mug Shot #2

His eyes grew larger each day, resisting the need for boundaries. He became obsessed with their constant expansion, as if his eyes had taken on a will of their own, growing until they overshadowed even him. This relentless focus on seeing, mixed with misgivings, had a powerful yet unsettling effect, as though his gaze could turn lentils into perils.

Declaration of Manifest Heresy

Pope Francis is hereby declared a heretic due to the willful and persistent adherence to errors in matters of faith as a baptized Catholic, using the Petrine Office to spread such heresies. As his soul is separated from the Catholic Church, Pope Francis is declared infamous and must be deposed.

These are Pope Francis’ heresies:

1-In Amoris Laetitia

Amoris Laetitia (The Joy of Love) by Pope Francis, particularly Chapter 8, contains or implies heresies, particularly in relation to moral relativism and the sacramental discipline of the Catholic Church. Below are the key points of concern considered as heretical:

Heresy of Moral Relativism: Amoris Laetitia suggests that moral truths may vary according to personal circumstances. This undermines the Church’s teaching on the objectivity of moral laws, which are universally binding, regardless of individual situations.

The idea that "irregular" situations (like being divorced and remarried without annulment) may sometimes be justified or excused based on personal discernment leads to the belief that there are no absolute moral norms.

Contradiction: The Church teaches that moral law is objective and universal. (See Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC) 1956: "The natural law expresses the original moral sense... valid for all.") And CCC 1955 The "divine and natural" law…expressed in the Decalogue.”

Heresy of Adultery and Sacramental Reception: The most controversial aspect is the suggestion that divorced and remarried Catholics (without annulment) could, under certain circumstances, receive Holy Communion. This implies a tolerance for adultery and contradicts the Church's long-standing teaching that those in a state of mortal sin cannot receive the Eucharist without sacramental confession and absolution.

This contradicts Canon Law (Canon 915), which states that those "persevering in manifest grave sin" are not to be admitted to Holy Communion.

Contradiction: The Church has consistently taught that marriage is indissoluble and that adultery is a grave sin. (See Catechism 2384 on divorce and 1415 on the state of grace required to receive Communion.)

Heresy of Situational Ethics: The document (Amoris Laetitia) suggests that the culpability of individuals in sinful situations may be reduced due to "mitigating factors" (AL 301), even comparing these sinful individuals to “certain saints”, which can only be a joke. This promotes a form of situational ethics, whereby the objective morality of an act (such as adultery) could be downplayed based on individual circumstances or intentions.

This undermines the Church's teaching on intrinsic evils, acts that are always and everywhere morally wrong, such as adultery and fornication.

Contradiction: The Church teaches that intrinsic evils are always wrong, regardless of intention or circumstance. (See Pope John Paul II’s Veritatis Splendor, 80: "Reason attests that there are objects of the human act which are by their nature incapable of being ordered to God.")

Heresy of Communion for the Divorced and Remarried: The ambiguity of Amoris Laetitia on whether divorced and remarried Catholics without annulment can receive Communion, opens the door to local interpretations that differ from long-established Catholic sacramental discipline.

Some bishops have interpreted the text as allowing for divorced and remarried couples to receive the Eucharist without living in continence (abstaining from sexual relations), which contradicts previous papal teachings like Familiaris Consortio (84) by John Paul II.

Contradiction: The Church teaches that those living in a state of public adultery (divorced and remarried without annulment) may not receive Communion unless they live in continence. (Canon 915, CCC 1650).

Pope Francis departs from the Church’s long-standing positions on marriage, sin, and the Eucharist.

2-Heresies in Pope Francis’ Interreligious Dialogue and Ecumenism:

Heresy of Irenicism: Irenicism refers to the effort to achieve unity by minimizing or downplaying doctrinal differences between the Catholic Church and sects. In other words, this heresy involves an approach to ecumenism that undermines the integrity of Catholic doctrine, allowing it to be distorted for the sake of unity. 

Relevance: Pope Francis' emphasis on dialogue and unity with other sects, compromises the Church's teachings. For example, downplaying the Catholic understanding of the Eucharist or the necessity of the Catholic Church for salvation dilutes core doctrines.

Contradiction: The Catholic Church teaches that unity must be based on the fullness of truth. (CCC 846 affirms "Outside the Church there is no salvation"; Canon 751 defines heresy as "the obstinate denial or doubt, after baptism, of a truth which must be believed with divine and catholic faith.").

This is the concept of heresy that I consider to be in its most strict sense.

Heresy of Religious Indifferentism: Religious indifferentism is the belief that all religions are equally true or valid paths to God, which contradicts the Church's teaching on the uniqueness of Catholicism as the one true faith.

Relevance: Pope Francis' statement that the "diversity of religions" is "willed by God" promotes religious indifferentism. This suggests that God wills multiple religions, implying that they are equally valid paths to salvation, which directly contradicts Catholic doctrine.

Contradiction: The Catholic Church teaches that Jesus Christ is the only way to salvation, and Catholicism is the true faith. (CCC 846: "All salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body"; Canon 1364 penalizes apostasy and heresy with excommunication.)

3-Promotion of Paganism/Pachamama:

By allowing the veneration of Pachamama statues during the Amazon Synod, Pope Francis caused scandal, with faithful Catholics viewing it as promoting paganism within the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church historically condemned syncretism and religious indifferentism, asserting that Christ is the only way to salvation (see Catechism of the Catholic Church 846). From this viewpoint, introducing pagan symbols into Catholic rituals undermines the Church’s teachings about the worship of the one true God and leads the faithful into error and confusion about the nature of Catholic worship.

These heresies compromise the distinctiveness of Catholic doctrine and threaten the integrity of the Church's teachings.

4-Moral Theology Emphasizing Mercy over Doctrine:

Heresy of Modernism: Pope Francis' emphasis on individual conscience and pastoral discernment reflects Modernist tendencies. Modernism, which was condemned by the Catholic Church, sought to adapt immutable Church doctrine to contemporary circumstances, thus undermining eternal truths. By focusing more on the pastoral approach, this emphasis bends long-standing Catholic teachings to fit modern situations.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC) speaks against the adaptation of doctrine to suit contemporary preferences or subjective circumstances. Modernism was condemned in Pascendi Dominici Gregis by Pope Pius X. The following excerpts are relevant:

CCC 2035: "The supreme degree of participation in the authority of Christ is ensured by the charism of infallibility. This infallibility extends as far as the deposit of divine Revelation itself."

CCC 88: "The Church’s Magisterium exercises the authority it holds from Christ to the fullest extent when it defines dogmas..."

Canon Law 750 §1: "A person must believe with divine and Catholic faith all those things contained in the word of God..."

Heresy of Moral Relativism: Similarly, the concern raised here is that by prioritizing individual conscience and pastoral discernment over clear, universally applicable doctrinal norms, Pope Francis promotes moral relativism. This means that moral truths are no longer considered absolute but subject to personal interpretation, weakening the Church's stance on absolute moral principles.

Heresy of Homosexual Blessings (Fiducia Supplicans): The Church has traditionally taught that homosexual acts are acts of grave depravity and intrinsically disordered (see Catechism of the Catholic Church 2357) and that marriage is a sacrament reserved for one man and one woman. From this view, offering blessings to same-sex unions is an endorsement of behavior that contradicts the natural law and Catholic moral teachings. By implying that the Catholic Church blesses what it considers sinful, it promotes moral relativism,  undermining the Church’s teaching on marriage and sexuality. It also contradicts Canon 915, which upholds sacramental integrity and the moral state required for receiving blessings or sacraments.

The Catholic Church holds that certain moral truths are absolute and not subject to individual interpretation:

CCC 1956: "The natural law, present in the heart of each man and established by reason, is universal in its precepts and its authority extends to all men."

CCC 1955: “The "divine and natural" law…expressed in the Decalogue.”

This article underscores the universality of natural law, which is foundational in Catholic moral teaching. The Catholic Church teaches that natural law reflects objective moral order, including in matters of human sexuality, and is binding on all people. Homosexual blessings contravene natural law principles, which apply to everyone regardless of societal or cultural pressures.

CCC 1783: "Conscience must be informed and moral judgment enlightened."

This article emphasizes that an individual's conscience must be formed by truth and proper moral teaching. While personal conscience is important, it cannot justify behavior that contradicts the moral law, such as blessings that endorse same-sex unions. Support for such blessings arises from a poorly formed conscience, misaligned with Church teachings on sexuality.

CCC 1796: "Conscience is a judgment of reason whereby the human person recognizes the moral quality of a concrete act."

Through the use of right reason informed by natural law and revelation, it becomes clear that homosexual acts are inherently disordered according to Catholic teaching, and thus recognizing or blessing such unions is a misjudgment of their moral quality.

Canon Law 747 §2: "The Church has the duty and innate right, independent of any human authority, to preach the Gospel to all peoples, also using the means of social communication proper to it."

This article reaffirms the Church's mission to proclaim the Gospel and its moral teachings without being swayed by contemporary societal norms or government pressures. The Catholic Church has the responsibility to uphold and communicate traditional teachings on marriage and sexuality, even when facing internal and external calls to modify or relax these teachings. Blessing same-sex unions is a failure to fulfill this mission, as it distorts the Church’s message on the nature of marriage and human relationships.

5-Sinodality and Decentralization

To begin with, the Synod on Synodality that just ended was no synod at all, since a synod is composed exclusively of bishops. Pope Francis likes to play with serious matters and uses and abuses the Chair of Saint Peter, which is why, besides being a heretic, he is the shame of the Catholic Church.

Heresy of Febronianism: Advocating for more authority to local bishops' conferences and decentralizing Church governance aligns with the principles of Febronianism. This heresy promoted by Pope Francis reduces the authority of the Papacy in favor of local episcopal autonomy, which undermines the central leadership role of the Pope as traditionally understood in Catholic teaching.

The principle of papal primacy is central to the governance of the Catholic Church and is safeguarded against any attempts to diminish it:

CCC 882: "The Pope, Bishop of Rome and Peter's successor, is the perpetual and visible source and foundation of the unity both of the bishops and of the whole company of the faithful."

CCC 883: "The college or body of bishops has no authority unless united with the Roman Pontiff, Peter's successor, as its head."

Canon Law 333 §1: "By virtue of his office, the Roman Pontiff not only possesses power over the universal Church but also obtains the primacy of ordinary power over all particular Churches and groups of them."

Heresy of Doctrinal Fragmentation: Pope Francis’ decentralized approach creates doctrinal inconsistencies and a lack of uniformity in teaching and practice across the Catholic Church,  undermining the Church’s universality (its catholicity) and its role as a cohesive, unified body under central guidance.

The Catholic Church emphasizes the importance of unity in doctrine, which requires consistency across local Churches:

CCC 815: "What are these bonds of unity? Above all, charity binds everything together in perfect harmony. But the unity of the pilgrim Church is also assured by visible bonds of communion: profession of one faith received from the Apostles..."

CCC 889: "In order to preserve the Church in the purity of the faith handed on by the apostles, Christ who is the Truth willed to confer on her a share in his own infallibility."

Canon Law 750 §2: "Each and every thing set forth definitively by the magisterium of the Church concerning the doctrine of faith and morals must be firmly accepted and held."

6-Revision of the Catechism on the Death Penalty 

Pope Francis’ revision of the Catechism of the Catholic Church regarding the death penalty is a significant doctrinal development. Here are some considerations to help one to understand this question:

Historical Context of Church Teaching on the Death Penalty:

The Church historically permitted the death penalty in certain cases, seeing it as a legitimate means for protecting society and serving justice. This was affirmed by theologians such as St. Thomas Aquinas and in earlier versions of the Catechism.

CCC 2267 before the 2018 revision allowed for the death penalty in cases where it was the only way to protect society, but emphasized that such cases were "very rare, if not practically nonexistent."

The 2018 Revision:

In 2018, Pope Francis revised CCC 2267, declaring that the death penalty is “inadmissible” in all cases, reflecting a stronger stance against capital punishment. The updated text states:

CCC 2267 (2018): “The Church teaches, in the light of the Gospel, that ‘the death penalty is inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person,’ and she works with determination for its abolition worldwide.”

Heresy of Doctrinal Change: The Church holds that heresy involves the obstinate denial or doubt, after baptism, of a truth that must be believed with divine and Catholic faith (Canon Law 751). This change is a departure from the Church’s traditional teaching, contradicting previous authoritative positions (such as those held by Aquinas, the Council of Trent, or Pope Pius XII).

Relevant Church Teachings:

Development vs. Change: The Church allows for the development of doctrine under certain circumstances, but it must remain in continuity with past teachings (CCC 94).

CCC 94: “Thanks to the assistance of the Holy Spirit, the understanding of both the realities and the words of the heritage of faith is able to grow in the life of the Church.”

Papal Authority: The Pope has the authority to make changes to the Catechism and to guide the development of doctrine, but this must be done without contradicting past infallible teaching. 

Conclusion: This development is a doctrinal rupture and therefore a heresy.

A Final Word

Knowing that the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith is led by a close ally of Pope Francis, chosen by Francis himself and also a heretic, it is clear that no matter how many heresies Francis promotes, he won’t be formally accused. For this reason, faithful Catholics have a moral obligation to denounce the doctrinal chaos currently reigning under Francis' papacy. This declaration, along with this publication, aims to fulfill that obligation. The Grand Inquisitor — Inquisition proclaims decrees of heresy, assured that God Our Lord Jesus Christ, the ultimate Judge, will exact retribution upon each soul, including those who support Pope Francis one way or another. There is no more serious matter than this one. In an age where information spreads fast, everyone must be considered warned about evil spreading inside the Catholic Church. I wouldn’t count on excuses.

Deposing Pope Francis is an important goal, and it is important to internalize this in order to achieve it, but there are others: restoring clarity in Church doctrine, reaffirming the Church’s traditional teachings, safeguarding the integrity of the faith for future generations, and combating moral decadence in general. If Catholics apply enough pressure on Pope Francis and his supporters, real change can happen. It’s not easy, but it’s not impossible either.

Here’s my counsel to everyone: stay away from the sinful ways of Pope Francis, but remain within the Catholic Church, for the Church belongs to the faithful, and the Catholic Church needs you. As for those who are confused, take note of what God Our Lord Jesus Christ said: “When it is evening, you say, ‘It will be fair weather, for the sky is red,’ and in the morning, ‘Today there will be a storm, for the sky is red and lowering.’ You know how to discern the appearance of the sky, but do you not understand the signs of the times?” (Matthew 16:2-3).

Yours very humbly in God Our Lord Jesus Christ,

Grand Inquisitor — Inquisition

             — Tyrants and Heretics —

Critique of Modern and Contemporary Decadence